4.5 Article

Optimizing and designing a leg shape to increase robustness of a running robot on rough terrain

Journal

BIOINSPIRATION & BIOMIMETICS
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/1748-3190/ac9cb1

Keywords

legged robots; dynamic robots; SLIP-based robots; minimalistic control; leg design; variable stiffness; bio-inspired robots

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The superior ability of dynamic legged locomotion in traversing rough terrain comes with the cost of fragile stability. This work demonstrates that a curved leg shape can improve the robot's robustness to perturbations without complicating the control scheme.
The superior ability of dynamic legged locomotion in traversing rough terrain relative to wheeled or tracked mechanisms comes with the cost of fragile stability. Simple control methods that use only a few basic detection sensors and apply a single controller help robots keep their balance when traversing unforeseen rough terrain. Exploiting multiple controllers simultaneously, such as the free leg length and stiffness in our hopping monopod, can further improve robustness but is often mechanically hard to implement. This work demonstrates that a curved leg shape can improve the robustness of a robot to perturbations in both terrain levels and initial horizontal velocity without complicating the control scheme. Our work develops spring loaded inverted pendulum (SLIP) based models that manifest the coupling of the leg's parameters and capture the rolling motion. We use these models to find an optimal combination of parameters that maximizes a measure for long-term stability-reaching a desired relative height above terrain. We demonstrate that when traversing unknown rough terrain, such optimal coupling can increase robustness to perturbations in the initial horizontal velocity by 93% relative to the optimal conventional SLIP model. We further demonstrate our results in experiments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available