4.7 Article

MERRIN: MEtabolic regulation rule INference from time series data

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 38, Issue -, Pages ii127-ii133

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac479

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. French Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-20-CE45-0001]
  2. French Laboratory of Excellence project `TULIP' [ANR-10-LABX-41, ANR-11-IDEX-0002-02]
  3. [ECCB2022]
  4. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-20-CE45-0001] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a novel approach to infer Boolean rules for metabolic regulation from time-series data and a prior knowledge network (PKN). By combining answer set programming and linear programming, candidate Boolean regulations that can reproduce the given data are generated. The quality of predictions depends on the available time-series data, such as kinetic, fluxomics or transcriptomics data.
Motivation: Many techniques have been developed to infer Boolean regulations from a prior knowledge network (PKN) and experimental data. Existing methods are able to reverse-engineer Boolean regulations for transcriptional and signaling networks, but they fail to infer regulations that control metabolic networks. Results: We present a novel approach to infer Boolean rules for metabolic regulation from time-series data and a PKN. Our method is based on a combination of answer set programming and linear programming. By solving both combinatorial and linear arithmetic constraints, we generate candidate Boolean regulations that can reproduce the given data when coupled to the metabolic network. We evaluate our approach on a core regulated metabolic network and show how the quality of the predictions depends on the available kinetic, fluxomics or transcriptomics time-series data. Availability and implementation Software available at . Supplementary information are available at .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available