4.5 Review

Effects of the green tea catechin epigallocatechin-3-gallate on Streptococcus mutans planktonic cultures and biofilms: systematic literature review of in vitro studies

Journal

BIOFOULING
Volume 38, Issue 7, Pages 687-695

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/08927014.2022.2116320

Keywords

Epigallocatechin-3-gallate; S; mutans; dental caries; biofilm

Funding

  1. Sao Paulo State Research Support Foundation (FAPESP) [2020/02658-7]
  2. Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) [304366/2020-0]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

EGCG can suppress the acid production of Streptococcus mutans by inhibiting enzyme activity and affect its virulence factors, but its effects on biofilms are still unclear. There is high variability in the research, and further studies are needed to confirm the effectiveness of EGCG against S. mutans biofilms.
This study aimed at performing a systematic review of the literature on the effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG) on Streptococcus mutans planktonic cultures and biofilms. The selected references demonstrated that EGCG suppresses S. mutans acid production by inhibiting the activity of enzymes such as lactate dehydrogenase and FIF0-ATPase. Regarding virulence factors, one study reported a reduction in soluble and insoluble polysaccharide synthesis, another demonstrated that EGCG inhibited GTase activity, and another showed effects of EGCG on the expression of gtf B, C, and D. The effects of EGCG on S. mutans biofilms were reported only by 2 of the selected studies. Moreover, high variability in effective concentrations and microbial assessment methods were observed. The literature suggests that EGCG has effects against S. mutans planktonic cells viability and virulence factors. However, the literature lacks studies with appropriate biofilm models to evaluate the precise effectiveness of EGCG against S. mutans biofilms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available