4.6 Article

Functional characterization of a novel GH94 glycoside phosphorylase, 3-O-β-D-glucopyranosyl β-D-glucuronide phosphorylase, and implication of the metabolic pathway of acidic carbohydrates in Paenibacillus borealis

Journal

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2022.07.098

Keywords

GH94; Phosphorylase; beta-glucuronidase; Paenibacillus borealis

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP15K07386]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel glycoside phosphorylase PBOR_13355 and beta-glucuronidase PBOR_13360 were identified in this study. They are predicted to work together in the cytosol to metabolize acidic carbohydrates.
Glycoside hydrolase family 94 (GH94) contains enzymes that reversibly catalyze the phosphorolysis of beta-glycosides. We conducted this study to investigate a GH94 protein (PBOR_13355) encoded in the genome of Paenibacillus borealis DSM 13188 with low sequence identity to known phosphorylases. Screening of acceptor substrates for reverse phosphorolysis in the presence of alpha-D-glucose 1-phosphate as a donor substrate showed that PBOR_13355 utilized D-glucuronic acid and p-nitrophenyl beta-D-glucuronide as acceptors. In the reaction with D-glucuronic acid, 3-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl-D-glucuronic acid was synthesized. PBOR_13355 showed a higher apparent catalytic efficiency to p-nitrophenyl beta-D-glucuronide than to D-glucuronic acid, and thus, PBOR_13355 was concluded to be a novel glycoside phosphorylase, 3-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl beta-D-glucuronide phosphorylase. PBOR_13360, encoded by the gene immediately downstream of the PBOR_13355 gene, was shown to be beta-glucuronidase. Collectively, PBOR_13355 and PBOR_13360 are predicted to work together in the cytosol to metabolize oligosaccharides containing the 3-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyl beta-D-glucuronide structure released from bacterial and plant acidic carbohydrates. (C) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available