4.6 Article

Post-learning caffeine administration improves 'what-when' and 'what-where' components of episodic-like memory in rats

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 433, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2022.113982

Keywords

Caffeine; Episodic-like memory; Hippocampus; Dopamine

Funding

  1. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico [CNPq 014/2013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies have shown that caffeine can improve the consolidation of episodic-like memory in Wistar rats, leading to increased dopamine turnover rate in the hippocampus.
Episodic-like memory (ELM) consists in the capacity of nonhuman animals to remember 'where' and 'when' a specific episode occurred ('what'). Previous studies have showed that Wistar rats can form an ELM, but not after a 24 h retention delay. On the other hand, it has been demonstrated that caffeine can improve episodic memory consolidation in humans. Therefore, we verified whether acute post-sample caffeine administration could improve ELM consolidation in Wistar rats, as well if it could be related to neurochemical changes in the pre-frontal cortex and hippocampus - regions related to episodic-like memory processing. 46 Male Wistar Rats, approximately 3 months-old, were divided into four groups as follows: untreated (n = 11), saline (n = 11), caffeine 10 mg /kg i.p (n = 12); caffeine 15 mg/kgi.p (n = 12) and tested in WWWhen/ELM task. The animals treated with caffeine in different dosages (10 mg/kg and 15 mg/kg) discriminated temporally and spatially the objects, respectively. These groups also showed a dopamine renewal rate in the hippocampus, suggesting that there was an increase in the turnover compared with the groups with no caffeine administration. We can conclude that caffeine leads to an improvement in the consolidation of the temporal ('what-when') and spatial ('what-where') aspects of episodic-like memory.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available