4.6 Article

Using Clinical Vignettes and a Modified Expert Delphi Panel to Determine Parameters for Identifying Non-Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Health Administrative and Electronic Medical Record Databases

Journal

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.08.002

Keywords

Database; Degenerative diseases; Electronic medical record; Rehabilitation; Spinal cord; Spinal cord diseases; Spinal cord inju-ries; Spinal stenosis; Spondylosis

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Expert consensus was obtained on the parameters and etiologic conditions required to identify cases of non-traumatic spinal cord injury (NTSCI) in health administrative and electronic medical record (EMR) databases through the rating of clinical vignettes. The study found that cauda equina syndromes should be considered and classified as NTSCI or traumatic SCI (TSCI) based on the mechanism of injury. In addition, neurologic impairments and etiology are necessary for classifying NTSCI cases, and cases with missing information may be listed as unclassifiable depending on the research purpose.
Objective: To obtain expert consensus on the parameters and etiologic conditions required to retrospectively identify cases of non-traumatic spinal cord injury (NTSCI) in health administrative and electronic medical record (EMR) databases based on the rating of clinical vignettes.Design: A modified Delphi process included 2 survey rounds and 1 remote consensus panel. The surveys required the rating of clinical vignettes, developed after chart reviews and expert consultation. Experts who participated in survey rounds were invited to participate in the Delphi Consen-sus Panel.Setting: An international collaboration using an online meeting platform.Participants: Thirty-one expert physicians and/or clinical researchers in the field of spinal cord injury (SCI).Main Outcome Measure(s): Agreement on clinical vignettes as NTSCI. Parameters to classify cases of NTSCI in health administrative and EMR databases.Results: In health administrative and EMR databases, cauda equina syndromes should be considered SCI and classified as a NTSCI or TSCI based on the mechanism of injury. A traumatic event needs to be listed for injury to be considered TSCI. To be classified as NTSCI, neurologic sufficient impairments (motor, sensory, bowel, and bladder) are required, in addition to an etiology. It is possible to have both a NTSCI and a TSCI, as well as a recovered NTSCI. If information is unavailable or missing in health administrative and EMR databases, the case may be listed as unclassifiable depending on the purpose of the research study.Conclusion: The Delphi panel provided guidelines to appropriately classify cases of NTSCI in health administrative and EMR databases. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2023;104:63-73 (c) 2022 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available