4.7 Article

The role of input selection and climate pre-classification on the performance of neural networks irradiance models

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 130, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2022.109643

Keywords

Global Horizontal Irradiance models; Artificial Neural Networks; Big data; Climate type; Klippen classification

Funding

  1. IPN-SIP, Mexico Grant
  2. [20211649]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper investigates the use of Klippen climate classification as a substitute for climatic measurements in neural network models for solar radiation. The study finds that when all data types are processed together, the impact of Klippen climate sub-classification on model performance is limited. However, if data are pre-classified according to climate type, significant improvements in model precision can be achieved.
Neural Network (NN) models are widely accepted in the derivation of solar radiation models due to their ability to adapt to various geographic and environmental conditions. Despite this, it is unclear what training variables are required to enhance the precision of the NN model or which of them could be considered redundant; therefore, this paper intends to clarify this issue by investigating if the Klippen climate classification could be used to substitute climatic measurements. To this end, We analyzed a variety of NN architectures using 20 years of data from 1629 weather stations belonging to three different climate types (Climate A, B, and C). We found that Klippen climate sub-classification had a limited effect on the models' performance when the information of all data types was processed together, resulting in barely noticeable improvements from 1.2% to 2.5%. However, if data were pre-classified according to climate type, the climate sub-classification input induced significant differences. Improvements up to 14% in the precision of the models were found for Climates B and A; moreover, temperature and relative humidity daily measurements could be replaced by Klippen climate information. Cross-validation analysis, using the same amount of data for all climate types, allowed us to confirm our findings for Climates A and B and revealed that data pre-classification according to climate type for Climate C, systematically increased errors from 10% to 24%, so replacing actual climatological measurements was not possible for this climate type. Revealing such patterns would facilitate the derivation of models for scenarios of limited information on temperature and relative humidity in some locations and reveals the usefulness of soft computing to go beyond understanding climate complexity.(c) 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available