4.6 Article

Crucial feature space for ductile bcc high-entropy alloys

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 121, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0124590

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. [2019YFA0209900]
  4. [U1764252]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The compressive properties of high-entropy alloys (HEAs) in bcc structure were investigated and a classification algorithm identified alloys with high compressive failure strain using Pugh's ratio and valence electron concentration as key attributes.
Body-centered cubic (bcc) high-entropy alloys (HEAs) are promising structural materials for nuclear power plants to ensure good radiation resistance. However, the majority of bcc HEAs show limited room temperature ductility even in compression. In addition to the compressive properties of as-cast high-activation bcc HEAs collected from the literature, those of low-activation ones were investigated by phase diagram calculations and experiments. Therefore, a consistent dataset comprising 93 samples was generated. A classification and regression tree (CART) algorithm was employed to differentiate the target bcc HEAs with a compressive failure strain of more than 50% from the others. The model generality of a finalized CART classifier was validated by training and testing F1 scores and accuracies. It was found that Pugh's ratio (kappa) and valence electron concentration (VEC) are two key attributes to identify the target alloys. The crucial kappa-VEC feature space displays that the targets are generally located in the region where kappa is larger than 3.129 or VEC is larger than 6.296. Especially, high-activation and low-activation samples seem to have opposite characteristics, motivating the further study of a deformation mechanism for low-activation bcc HEAs. Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available