Journal
APPLIED ENERGY
Volume 325, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.119844
Keywords
Multi -objective genetic algorithm; District heating and cooling systems; Design optimization; Pipe network; Central plant positioning
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
By proposing a graph-based multi-objective genetic algorithm, we can optimize the pipe network design and central plant positioning in district heating and cooling systems simultaneously. Compared to expert experience, this algorithm offers better cost and efficiency optimization, leading to significant energy and emissions savings.
District heating and cooling systems are one of the most promising technologies to support rapid decarbonization of our energy system as they enable significant energy and emissions savings. However, realizing such savings is highly dependent on the pipe network design and the central plant positioning. Today, the pipe network design and the central plant positioning still rely on expert experience and most of them are sub-optimal in terms of cost and efficiency performance. To tackle this issue, we propose a graph-based multi-objective genetic algorithm for simultaneous optimization of the pipe network design and the position of a central plant in a district heating and cooling system. Differing from a traditional genetic algorithm, our proposed algorithm uses a custom mutation and crossover technique to ensure the generation of valid offspring. The extra relocation step in the algorithm enables the optimization of the central plant location. Finally, we used the proposed algorithm to design the pipe network layout and decide the central plant location for six city districts in a metropolitan area in China. To assess and benchmark the performance of our proposed method, we utilized an expert-based approach in which several experienced engineers produced reference designs. Results demonstrate that our proposed algorithm outperforms the reference designs for all six cases. The proposed method was able to achieve a maximal pressure drop reduction of 37% and a maximal cost saving of 10% compared to the reference design.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available