4.8 Article

A low temperature SOFC as a self-promoted reactor for CO2 catalytic hydrogenation

Journal

APPLIED CATALYSIS B-ENVIRONMENTAL
Volume 317, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121778

Keywords

EPOC; Self-power electropromoted reactor; CO2 hydrogenation; Methanation; RWGS; SOFC

Funding

  1. European Union
  2. Greek national funds through the Operational Program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call RESEARCH - CREATE - INNOVATE [T1EDK-01631]
  3. Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences (FORTH/ICE-HT)
  4. Research Committee of the Uni- versity of Patras

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study demonstrates a method to effectively promote catalytic reactions using limited power generated by low-temperature fuel cells, reducing energy consumption and environmental impact. By designing a novel low-temperature fuel cell reactor and utilizing internal power, electrochemical promotion of CO2 hydrogenation has been achieved.
Low temperature operation of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFC) typically provides limited and insufficient power for practical applications. The present work demonstrates how this limited power can be utilized effectively for the promotion of a catalytic reaction taking place on a catalyst electrode with minimal energy consumption and environmental impact. A novel design of a low-temperature SOFC reactor is reported and utilized for the electrochemical promotion of CO2 hydrogenation, a reaction of both environmental and industrial importance. The power demand for the enhancement of the catalytic reaction rates is produced in situ by the cell during the parallel oxidation of hydrogen which acts both as a reactant and as a fuel. The results of the present study pave the way for the utilization of Electrochemical Promotion of Catalysis (EPOC) in a wireless configuration, using exclusively the internal power of low temperature, low pressure, SOFCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available