4.7 Article

Acoustic behaviour of needle punched nonwoven structures produced from various natural and synthetic fibers

Journal

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
Volume 199, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.109043

Keywords

Noise reduction coefficient; Sound absorption coefficient; Needle -punched nonwoven; Jute caddie; Flax comber noil; Hollow conjugated polyester

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This research investigates the acoustic properties of needle punched nonwoven fabrics in textiles and finds that different fiber types, fineness, cross-sectional shapes, and fabric areal density have an impact on sound absorption. Hollow conjugated cross sections exhibit the highest noise absorption, while nonwovens made from biodegradable and recyclable materials show good sound absorption properties.
Porous materials are an excellent example of passive materials, which reduces sound energy by dissipat-ing heat energy due to the presence of a void structure. In textiles, nonwovens are highly porous and less expensive materials compared to woven and knitted structures. The present research investigates the effect of fiber type, fiber fineness, fiber cross-sectional shape, and fabric areal density on the acoustic properties of needle punched nonwoven fabrics produced from flax comber noil and jute caddies and polyester staple fibers of circular, hollow, and hollow conjugated cross-sections. The study reveals that hollow conjugated cross section exhibits maximum noise absorption. Nonwoven made from biodegrad-able and recyclable jute caddies, and flax comber noil shows considerable noise absorption properties compared to polyester synthetic fiber, although they are inexpensive. Higher punch density results in better compactness of nonwoven fabric leading to improved sound absorption property. Layered nonwo-ven structures are responsible for better sound absorption properties due to the presence of an air layer.(c) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available