4.7 Article

Thickness-designable acoustic metamaterial for passive phased arrays

Journal

APPLIED ACOUSTICS
Volume 198, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2022.108942

Keywords

Acoustic metamaterial; Helmholtz resonators; Labyrinth resonant cavity; Metascreen

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51835008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Passive phase-controlled acoustic arrays based on metamaterial surfaces artificially manipulate acoustic waves, which have a wide range of applications. This study proposes an array based on Helmholtz resonators and labyrinth acoustic metamaterials, which achieves full phase control at a specific frequency through optimized thickness.
Passive phase-controlled acoustic arrays based on metamaterial surfaces artificially manipulate acoustic waves, which can be used in biomedical imaging and nondestructive testing. One of the most representative applications is ultrasonic therapy using a passive phased array within a complete 2 pi phase. In contrast, the surface thickness is 1/10 the wavelength of the operating frequency. However, conventional design methods feature a fixed array thickness for a specific frequency. This becomes necessary for different application scenarios where different thicknesses are needed. This study proposed a labyrinth resonant cavity metascreen phased array based on Helmholtz resonators and convoluted labyrinth acoustic metamaterials. The thickness of this array can be optimized to accommodate a specific operating frequency to achieve full 2 pi phase control by adjusting only one parameter. Theoretical simulations and experimental results verified the acoustic wave manipulation effect. The proposed method may find utility in applications for noninvasive ultrasonic therapy, including nondestructive testing, acoustic communication, and biomedical imaging. (C) 2022 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available