4.7 Article

Ferrate(VI) as a greener oxidant: Electrochemical generation and treatment of phenol

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 319, Issue -, Pages 130-136

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.12.020

Keywords

Ferrate; Sponge iron; Oxidation; Coagulation; Removal

Funding

  1. Jilin Provincial Science & Technology Department [20130413046GH]
  2. Science and Technology Department of Jilin City [2015334006]
  3. Education Department of Jilin Province [2014105]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ferrate(VI) ((FeO42-)-O-VI, Fe(VI)) is a greener oxidant in the treatment of drinking water and wastewater. The electrochemical synthesis of Fe(VI) may be considered environmentally friendly because it involves one-step process to convert Fe(0) to Fe(VI) without using harmful chemicals. Electrolysis was performed by using a sponge iron as an anode in NaOH solution at different ionic strengths. The cyclic voltammetric (CV) curves showed that the sponge iron had higher electrical activity than the grey cast iron. The optimum current density was 0.054 mA cm(-2) in 10 M NaOH solution, which is much lower than the electrolyte concentrations used in other electrode materials. A comparison of current efficiency and energy consumption was conducted and is briefly discussed. The generated ferrate solution was applied to degrade phenol in water at two levels (2 mg L-1 and 5 mg L-1). The maximum removal efficiency was similar to 70% and the optimum pH for phenol treatment was 9.0. Experiments on phenol removal using conventional coagulants (ferric chloride (FeCl3) and polyaluminium chloride (PAC)) were performed independently to demonstrate that removal of phenol by Fe(VI) occurred mainly by oxidative transformation. A combination of Fe(VI) and coagulant may be advantageous in enhancing removal efficiency, adjusting pH, and facilitating flocculation. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available