4.7 Article

Hydration mechanism and leaching behavior of bauxite-calcination-method red mud-coal gangue based cementitious materials

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 314, Issue -, Pages 172-180

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.04.040

Keywords

Red mud; Coal gangue; Cementitious materials; Hydration mechanism; Leaching behavior

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51302012, 51234008]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [FRF-TP-15-055A3]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A deep investigation on the hydration mechanism of bauxite-calcination-method red mud-coal gangue based cementitious materials was conducted from viewpoints of hydration products and hydration heat analysis. As a main hydration product, the microstructure of C-A-S-H gel was observed using high resolution transmission electron microscopy. It was found that the C-A-S-H gel is composed of amorphous regions and nanocrystalline regions. Most of regions in the C-A-S-H gel are amorphous with continuous distribution, and the nanocrystalline regions on scale of similar to 5 nm are dispersed irregularly within the amorphous regions. The hydration heat of red mud-coal gangue based cementitious materials is much lower than that of the ordinary Portland cement. A hydration model was proposed for this kind of cementitious materials, and the hydration process mainly consists of four stages which are dissolution of materials, formation of C-A-S-H gels and ettringite, cementation of hydration products, and polycondensation of C-A-S-H gels. There are no strict boundaries among these four basic stages, and they proceed crossing each other. Moreover, the leaching toxicity tests were also performed to prove that the developed red mud-coal gangue based cementitious materials are environmentally acceptable. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available