4.7 Article

Evaluating the role of re-adsorption of dissolved Hg2+ during cinnabar dissolution using isotope tracer technique

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 317, Issue -, Pages 466-475

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.05.084

Keywords

Cinnabar dissolution; Hg re-adsorption on cinnabar surface; Isotope tracer technique; Isotope dilution; Redox condition

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2013CB430002]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21120102040, 21577134]
  3. US Department of Energy [DE-FG01-05EW07033]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cinnabar dissolution is an important factor controlling mercury (Hg) cycling. Recent studies have suggested the co-occurrence of re-adsorption of the released Hg during the course of cinnabar dissolution. However, there is a lack of feasible techniques that can quantitatively assess the amount of Hg re-adsorbed on cinnabar when investigating cinnabar dissolution. In this study, a new method, based on isotope tracing and dilution techniques, was developed to study the role of Hg re-adsorption in cinnabar dissolution. The developed method includes two key components: (1) accurate measurement of both released and spiked Hg in aqueous phase and (2) estimation of re-adsorbed Hg on cinnabar surface via the reduction in spiked 202Hg(2+). By adopting the developed method, it was found that the released Hg for trials purged with oxygen could reach several hundred mu g L-1, while no significant cinnabar dissolution was detected under anaerobic condition. Cinnabar dissolution rate when considering Hg re-adsorption was approximately 2 times the value calculated solely with the Hg detected in the aqueous phase. These results suggest that ignoring the Hg re-adsorption process can significantly underestimate the importance of cinnabar dissolution, highlighting the necessity of applying the developed method in future cinnabar dissolution studies. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available