4.7 Article

Rice ingestion is a major pathway for human exposure to organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) in China

Journal

JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
Volume 318, Issue -, Pages 686-693

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.07.055

Keywords

OPFRs; Rice; Food; Dietary intake; Human exposure

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education of China [IRT 13024]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31170473, 21037002, 21307061, 21407085]
  3. Tianjin Natural Science Foundation [14JCQNJC08900]
  4. Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [2013003112016]
  5. Postdoctoral Science Foundation of China [2014M550138]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although organophosphate flame retardants (OPFRs) have been shown to accumulate in abiotic and biotic environmental compartments, data about OPFRs concentrations in various foods are limited and are none in humans through diets. In this work, the concentrations of 6 typical OPFR5 were investigated in 50 rice samples, 75 commonly consumed foods and 45 human hair samples from China. The dietary intakes of OPFRs for adult people via food ingestion were estimated. The concentrations of EOPFRs in foods ranged from 0.004 ng/g to 287 ng/g. OPFRs were detected in 53.3% of the human hair samples. The highest OPFRs concentrations were found in rice and vegetables. Tri(2-chloroethyl)phosphate(TCEP), tris(2-chloroisopropyl)phosphate(TCIPP), and tri(2-ethyltexyl)phosphate(TEHP) were predominant in all food samples. OPFRs concentrations in foods were not significantly affected by the packaging materials. The mean dietary intakes of EOPFRs for adult males and females were 539 and 601 ng/kg body weight/day, respectively. The greatest contribution to these values is from rice, accounting for approximately 60% of the total intake, particularly from rice protein. Rice ingestion was considered a potential major pathway for human exposure to OPFRs, and regional differences in the levels of OPFRs in foods and dietary differences should be given more attention in the future. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available