4.8 Article

Minimizing Molecular Misidentification in Imaging Low-Abundance Protein Interactions Using Spectroscopic Single-Molecule Localization Microscopy

Journal

ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.2c02417

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [CHE-1954430, EFRI-1830969]
  2. National Institutes of Health [R21GM141675, R01EY026078, R01EY019949, R01GM140478, R01GM139151, R01GM143397, U54CA268084]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study developed a deep learning-based imaging analysis method to minimize molecular misidentification in three-color super-resolution imaging. By characterizing pure samples of different photoswitchable fluorophores and visualizing distinct subcellular proteins in cells, the researchers verified a 3-fold reduction in molecular misidentification in the new imaging method.
Super-resolution microscopy can capture spatiotemporal organizations of protein interactions with resolution down to 10 nm; however, the analyses of more than two proteins involving low-abundance protein are challenging because spectral crosstalk and heterogeneities of individual fluorescent labels result in molecular misidentification. Here we developed a deep learning-based imaging analysis method for spectroscopic single-molecule localization micros-copy to minimize molecular misidentification in three-color super-resolution imaging. We characterized the 3-fold reduction of molecular misidentification in the new imaging method using pure samples of different photoswitchable fluorophores and visualized three distinct subcellular proteins in U2-OS cell lines. We further validated the protein counts and interactions of TOMM20, DRP1, and SUMO1 in a well-studied biological process, Staurosporine-induced apoptosis, by comparing the imaging results with Western-blot analyses of different subcellular portions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available