Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Outcomes After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Versus Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of ul-trathin Descemet stripping (automated) endothelial ker-atoplasty (UT-DS(A)EK) versus Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for the treatment of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) and bullous keratopa-thy (BK). DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: Literature containing DMEK and UT-DSAEK were searched in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PubMed, EMBASE, LILACS, and through manual reference searching. Studies were in-cluded that measured the outcome of interventions- including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothe-lial cell density (ECD), and postoperative complications, especially graft detachment with the need of re-bubbling, graft rejection, graft failure, and postoperative elevated intraocular pressure (IOP)-in patients with FED and BK. Included outcomes were pooled as standardized mean differences (SMD) or risk ratios (RR) using random ef-fects models. Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed us-ing the Q-test and I 2 statistic. RESULTS: Seven (of 163) studies met all the inclu-sion and exclusion criteria. Meta-analysis showed a signif-icantly better BCVA 12 months postoperatively, but an increased re-bubbling rate in eyes after DMEK compared with eyes after UT-DS(A)EK (BCVA: SMD = 0.50 [95% CI 0.27-0.74] and re-bubbling rate: RR = 0.33 [95% CI 0.16-0.67]). All other parameters did not differ significantly between both interventions, although esti -mates were imprecise (graft failure: RR = 0.65 [95% CI 0.18-2.30], graft rejection: RR = 1.40 [95% CI 0.27-7.30], and postoperative intraocular pressure elevation: RR = 1.14 [95% CI 0.60-2.18]). Postoperative SMDs of ECD could not be evaluated due to significant hetero-geneity between studies. CONCLUSIONS: Although the improvement in BCVA was higher after UT-DS(A)EK than after conventional DS(A)EK, the BCVA after DMEK was still superior. The complication rates were comparable for both procedures, except for the higher rate of re-bubbling after DMEK.(Am J Ophthalmol 2023;245: 222-232. (c) 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Automated summary

This study compared the efficacy and safety of ultra-thin Descemet stripping (automated) endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DS(A)EK) versus Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for the treatment of Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (FED) and bullous keratopathy (BK). The results showed that BCVA was better after DMEK compared to UT-DS(A)EK, but there was a higher rate of re-bubbling after DMEK.