4.4 Article

Powered Micro-saw Versus Conventional Osteotome for Septorhinoplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Comparative Study

Journal

AESTHETIC PLASTIC SURGERY
Volume 47, Issue 3, Pages 1133-1141

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00266-022-03083-3

Keywords

Ecchymosis; Edema; Osteotomy; Rhinoplasty; Micro-saw; Lateral osteotomy

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the use of a conventional osteotome and a powered micro-saw in septorhinoplasty. The results showed that using a powered micro-saw for osteotomy resulted in less postoperative pain and nasal blockage compared to using a conventional osteotome. The functional and aesthetic outcomes were similar between the two methods. Therefore, a powered micro-saw can be considered as an alternative to a conventional osteotome.
Background Various powered instruments are used to perform osteotomy. A consensus on the best method has not been established due to discrepancies in previous studies. This study aimed to compare the conventional osteotome and a powered micro-saw during septorhinoplasty. Methods The single-center, prospective cohort study included 60 patients that were grouped into two groups of 30 each. Group 1 underwent open septorhinoplasty using a conventional osteotome, and group 2 underwent open septorhinoplasty using a powered micro-saw. Postoperative edema, ecchymosis, pain, and nasal blockage were compared between groups. Preoperative and postoperative (6 months) functional and aesthetic outcomes were compared based on FACE-Q, SNOT-22, and T-NOSE scores. Results There were not any differences in age, gender, follow-up duration, the Brinkman index, or level of education between groups. Postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in group 2 on d 1 and d 3 postsurgery. Nasal blockage scores were significantly higher in group 1 on d 3 and d 7 postsurgery. Edema and ecchymosis scores were similar in both groups at all time points. Preoperative and postoperative (6 months) functional and aesthetic outcomes were also similar in both groups. Conclusion Osteotomy using a powered micro-saw is an effective technique that results in less postoperative pain and nasal blockage than when using conventional osteotome. Early postoperative period edema and ecchymosis scores and long-term functional and aesthetic outcomes are similar when using a powered micro-saw and a conventional osteotome. Osteotomy using a powered micro-saw can be considered an alternative to using a conventional osteotome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available