4.8 Review

Advances in Solution-Processed OLEDs and their Prospects for Use in Displays

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202207454

Keywords

large-area displays; organic light-emitting diodes; printing; solution process

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review summarizes the challenges and progress in the development of solution-processed organic light-emitting diodes (SOLEDs) in both industry and academia. Solution processing offers advantages like material efficiency, low-cost production, and scalability. However, there are complications related to solvent resistance and suitable solution-processable materials, ultimately leading to less efficient and shorter-lived SOLEDs compared to those fabricated by thermal evaporation. This review highlights the current status of SOLED development and presents research guidelines to overcome these limitations and achieve efficient, long-lasting, and commercially-viable SOLEDs.
This review outlines problems and progress in development of solution-processed organic light-emitting diodes (SOLEDs) in industry and academia. Solution processing has several advantages such as low consumption of materials, low-cost processing, and large-area manufacturing. However, use of a solution process entails complications, such as the need for solvent resistivity and solution-processable materials, and yields SOLEDs that have limited luminous efficiency, severe roll-off characteristics, and short lifetime compared to OLEDs fabricated using thermal evaporation. These demerits impede production of practical SOLED displays. This review outlines the industrial demands for commercial SOLEDs and the current status of SOLED development in industries and academia, and presents research guidelines for the development of SOLEDs that have high efficiency, long lifetime, and good processability to achieve commercialization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available