4.8 Article

Long-Life Regenerated LiFePO4 from Spent Cathode by Elevating the d-Band Center of Fe

Journal

ADVANCED MATERIALS
Volume 35, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.202208034

Keywords

battery recycling; direct regeneration; elevated d-band centers; Fe-O bonding; heterogeneous interfaces

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, spent LFP was regenerated using environmentally friendly ethanol, and the cycling stability was improved by elevating the d-band center of Fe atoms via construction of a heterogeneous interface. The regenerated LFP exhibited excellent cycling performance at a high rate, with approximately 80% capacity retention after 1000 cycles.
A large amount of spent LiFePO4 (LFP) has been produced in recent years because it is one of the most widely used cathode materials for electric vehicles. The traditional hydrometallurgical and pyrometallurgical recycling methods are doubted because of the economic and environmental benefits; the direct regeneration method is considered a promising way to recycle spent LFP. However, the performance of regenerated LFP by direct recycling is not ideal due to the migration of Fe ions during cycling and irreversible phase transition caused by sluggish Li+ diffusion. The key to addressing the challenge is to immobilize Fe atoms in the lattice and improve the Li+ migration capability during cycling. In this work, spent LFP is regenerated by using environmentally friendly ethanol, and its cycling stability is promoted by elevating the d-band center of Fe atoms via construction of a heterogeneous interface between LFP and nitrogen-doped carbon. The Fe-O bonding is strengthened and the migration of Fe ions during cycling is suppressed due to the elevated d-band center. The Li+ diffusion kinetics in the regenerated LFP are improved, leading to an excellent reversibility of the phase transition. Therefore, the regenerated LFP exhibits an ultrastable cycling performance at a high rate of 10 C with approximate to 80% capacity retention after 1000 cycles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available