4.8 Article

Wafer-Scale Radial Junction Solar Cells with 21.1% Efficiency Using c-Si Microwires

Journal

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 46, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.202208377

Keywords

crystalline silicons; radial junctions; silicon microwires; solar cells; wafer-scales

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean Government (MSIP) [NRF-2020R1A4A1019568, NRF-2019R1A2C2086602, NRF- 2019M1A2A2065614, NRF-2022R1C1C2004320, NRF-2021R1F1A1064243, NRF- 2022R1C1C1010025]
  2. Carbon Neutral Institute Research Fund of UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science Technology) [1.220098.01]
  3. Development Program of the Korea Institute of Energy Research (KIER) [C2-2402]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study aims to demonstrate that conventional fabrication techniques can be applied to MW-based solar cells at wafer scale while maintaining high efficiency. The results show that increasing the device size can significantly improve the open-circuit voltage and fill factor by reducing recombination losses at the device edge.
Microwire (MW)-based radial junction crystalline silicon (c-Si) solar cells have great potential as an emerging energy device with an efficiency of over 20%. However, the competitive efficiency of MW-based c-Si solar cells in realizing a wafer-scale device is limiting its commercialization. In this study, the aim is to demonstrate that conventional fabrication techniques can be applied to MW-based solar cells while not only increasing the size from the lab-scale to the wafer-scale but also retaining an efficiency of >20%. Surprisingly, an improvement in open-circuit voltage and fill factor is observed with an increase in device size, due to the reduction of recombination loss at the device edge. Finally, a successful demonstration of 21.1% efficiency at 4-inch wafer-scale (25 cm(2)) in c-Si MW solar cell is observed, while an efficiency of 20.6% at a lab-scale size (1 cm(2)) is observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available