4.5 Article

National register data are of value in studies on miscarriage-Validation of the healthcare register data in Finland

Journal

ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages 1245-1252

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14445

Keywords

blighted ovum; coverage; miscarriage; missed abortion; spontaneous abortion; treatment of miscarriage; validation study

Funding

  1. Hospital district of Helsinki and Uusimaa

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite the high prevalence of miscarriages, there is a lack of systematic registration and research. By validating the Finnish health registry data, we found that it is reliable and feasible for identifying miscarriages, different types of miscarriages, and non-surgical treatment.
Introduction Despite the high prevalence of miscarriages, they are not systematically registered and few epidemiological studies have been done. As Finnish health registries are comprehensive and widely used in research, we validated the Finnish register data concerning diagnostics and treatment of miscarriage, and treatment-related adverse events. Material and methods We conducted a validation study regarding miscarriage-related codes of diagnoses and surgical procedures in a Finnish National Hospital Discharge Registry (NHDR) by comparing the information from the NHDR with that of the hospital records. We selected a random sample of 4 months during 1998-2016 from three hospitals, comprising 687 women aged 15-49 experiencing a first miscarriage during follow-up. Women with diagnoses unrelated to miscarriage, or proven to be other than miscarriage, were excluded. The final sample consisted of 643 women with confirmed miscarriage, which was used for analyses regarding the diagnosis, treatment and adverse events of miscarriage treatment. Results The majority of miscarriages registered in the NHDR were confirmed by the hospital records (positive predictive value [PPV] = 93.6% [95% confidence interval [CI] 91.8%-95.4%]). Different types of miscarriage were also reliably identified; spontaneous abortion with PPV = 85.6% (95% CI 80.9%-89.2%), missed abortion with PPV = 92.7% (95% CI 88.8%-95.3%) and blighted ovum with PPV = 91.1% (95% CI 84.3%-95.1%). The PPV of surgical treatment (62.2% [95% CI 55.7%-68.3%]) was lower than the PPV of non-surgical treatment (93.3% [95% CI 90.5%-95.3%]). The diagnoses regarding adverse events of miscarriage treatment could be reliably identified. The PPV for clinical infections was 76.0% (95% CI 56.6%-88.5%) and for retained products of conception or/and vaginal bleeding 96.8% (95% CI 83.8%-99.4%). Conclusions The coverage of the NHDR was good concerning identification of miscarriages, different types of miscarriages and non-surgical treatment. Nevertheless, there is a need for clearly defined procedural codes concerning to medical treatment of miscarriage. The register-based data are reliable and practicable for both clinical evaluation and research concerning miscarriage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available