4.3 Article

First test of a species-selective adult sea lamprey migration barrier

Journal

JOURNAL OF GREAT LAKES RESEARCH
Volume 42, Issue 4, Pages 893-898

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jglr.2016.04.009

Keywords

Invasive species; Sea lamprey; Wetted ramp; Selective passage

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A species-specific, non-chemical method of preventing adult sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) passage into Great Lakes tributary streams is necessary to help reduce the population of this invasive fish species and prevent fragmentation of habitat of native fish species. We tested the effectiveness of a barrier in the form of a short angled (10 and 20) wetted ramp in a lab and field setting. At the steeper angle, none of the ten adult sea lampreys tested achieved passage, although numerous attempts were observed. On the shallower ramp, 15-20% (3-4/20) of tested individual lampreys passed. We tested sample groups of nine native fish species and found varying rates of attempted and successful passage among these groups. More species and individuals succeeded in passing the 10 ramp. At least one individual from each of six species was able to pass the barrier: common sucker (Catostomus commersonii), hognose sucker (Hypentelium nigricans), creek chub (Semotilus atromaculatus), green sunfish (Lepomis cyanellus), smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu), and golden shiner (Notemigonus crysoleucas). Only two of the individual walleyes (Sander vitreus) swam high enough to fully emerge from the downstream pool, with no successful passage. Although our sample sizes are not large enough to infer effectiveness of the selective ramp barrier at a species level, we conclude that inclined wetted ramps merit further investigation as a possible selective sea lamprey barrier. (C) 2016 International Association for Great Lakes Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available