4.8 Article

Algorithmic Design of 3D Wireframe RNA Polyhedra

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages 16608-16616

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c06035

Keywords

RNA origami; wireframe; polyhedra; kissing loops; self-assembly; cryo-EM

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland [311639, 308992]
  2. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) Early-Career Scientists [18K18144, 19KK0261]
  3. NSF-DMS [1800443/1764366]
  4. Nokia Foundation
  5. JSPS [18K19831, 19H04201]
  6. European Research Council [694410]
  7. project AEDNA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents an algorithmic design process and software pipeline for rendering 3D wireframe polyhedral nanostructures in single-stranded RNA. Users can create models of desired nanostructures using standard 3D graphic design software, and the pipeline generates corresponding RNA nucleotide sequences for experimental folding in the laboratory.
We address the problem of de novo design and synthesis of nucleic acid nanostructures, a challenge that has been considered in the area of DNA nanotechnology since the 1980s and more recently in the area of RNA nanotechnology. Toward this goal, we introduce a general algorithmic design process and software pipeline for rendering 3D wireframe polyhedral nanostructures in single-stranded RNA. To initiate the pipeline, the user creates a model of the desired polyhedron using standard 3D graphic design software. As its output, the pipeline produces an RNA nucleotide sequence whose corresponding RNA primary structure can be transcribed from a DNA template and folded in the laboratory. As case examples, we design and characterize experimentally three 3D RNA nanostructures: a tetrahedron, a triangular bipyramid, and a triangular prism. The design software is openly available and also provides an export of the targeted 3D structure into the oxDNA molecular dynamics simulator for easy simulation and visualization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available