4.8 Article

PEGylated Gold Nanoparticles Target Age- Associated B Cells In Vivo

Journal

ACS NANO
Volume 16, Issue 11, Pages 18119-18132

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.2c04871

Keywords

gold nanoparticles; polymer-coating; in vivo toxicity; targeted delivery; B cells; age-associated B cells

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) through the National Centre of Competence in Research Bio-Inspired Nanomaterials [156871, 156372, 182317]
  2. Adolphe Merkle Foundation (Fribourg, Switzerland)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that polymer-coated gold nanoparticles mainly interact with a subpopulation of B cells called age-associated B cells. However, they do not affect the percentages of other B cell populations or immune responses. These findings suggest that gold nanoparticles may be a safe tool for targeted therapy.
Engineered gold nanoparticles (GNPs) have become a useful tool in various therapeutic and diagnostic applications. Uncertainty remains regarding the possible impact of GNPs on the immune system. In this regard, we investigated the interactions of polymer-coated GNPs with B cells and their functions in mice. Surprisingly, we observed that polymer-coated GNPs mainly interact with the recently identified subpopulation of B lymphocytes named age-associated B cells (ABCs). Importantly, we also showed that GNPs did not affect cell viability or the percentages of other B cell populations in different organs. Furthermore, GNPs did not activate B cell innate-like immune responses in any of the tested conditions, nor did they impair adaptive B cell responses in immunized mice. Together, these data provide an important contribution to the otherwise limited knowledge about GNP interference with B cell immune function, and demonstrate that GNPs represent a safe tool to target ABCs in vivo for potential clinical applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available