4.4 Article

Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus shows poor replication but significant induction of antiviral responses in human monocyte-derived macrophages and dendritic cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL VIROLOGY
Volume 97, Issue -, Pages 344-355

Publisher

MICROBIOLOGY SOC
DOI: 10.1099/jgv.0.000351

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council of the Academy of Finland [252252, 255780]
  2. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  3. Finnish Cultural Foundation
  4. Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation
  5. Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health
  6. Academy of Finland (AKA) [255780, 255780] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study we assessed the ability of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) to replicate and induce innate immunity in human monocyte-derived macrophages and dendritic cells (MDDCs), and compared it with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Assessments of viral protein and RNA levels in infected cells showed that both viruses were impaired in their ability to replicate in these cells. Some induction of IFN-lambda 1, CXCL10 and MxA mRNAs in both macrophages and MDDCs was seen in response to MERS-CoV infection, but almost no such induction was observed in response to SARS-CoV infection. ELISA and Western blot assays showed clear production of CXCL10 and MxA in MERS-CoV-infected macrophages and MDDCs. Our data suggest that SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV replicate poorly in human macrophages and MDDCs, but MERS-CoV is nonetheless capable of inducing a readily detectable host innate immune response. Our results highlight a clear difference between the viruses in activating host innate immune responses in macrophages and MDDCs, which may contribute to the pathogenesis of infection.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available