4.6 Article

Teaching Structure: A Qualitative Evaluation of a Structural Competency Training for Resident Physicians

Journal

JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 32, Issue 4, Pages 430-433

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-016-3924-7

Keywords

structural competency; social determinants of health; structural vulnerability; cultural competency; medical education

Funding

  1. Greater Good Science Center
  2. UC Berkeley-UCSF Joint Medical Program
  3. University of California Humanities Research Institute
  4. University of California Social Science Matrix

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The influence of societal inequities on health has long been established, but such content has been incorporated unevenly into medical education and clinical training. Structural competency calls for medical education to highlight the important influence of social, political, and economic factors on health outcomes. This article describes the development, implementation, and evaluation of a structural competency training for medical residents. A California family medicine residency program serving a patient population predominantly (88 %) with income below 200 % of the federal poverty level. A cohort of 12 residents in the family residency program. The training was designed to help residents recognize and develop skills to respond to illness and health as the downstream effects of social, political, and economic structures. The training was evaluated via qualitative analysis of surveys gathered immediately post-training (response rate 100 %) and a focus group 1 month post-training (attended by all residents not on service). Residents reported that the training had a positive impact on their clinical practice and relationships with patients. They also reported feeling overwhelmed by increased recognition of structural influences on patient health, and indicated a need for further training and support to address these influences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available