3.8 Article

Interobserver Variability of Gross Tumor Volume Delineation for Colorectal Liver Metastases Using Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Journal

ADVANCES IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101020

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to evaluate the interobserver variability in contouring GTV for colorectal liver metastases using MRI and CT in the setting of SABR. The results showed that MR LAVA exhibited the lowest interobserver variability, indicating the benefit of using MR to complement CT in GTV contouring for colorectal liver metastases.
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the interobserver variability in the contouring of the gross tumor volume (GTV) on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and computed tomography (CT) for colorectal liver metastases in the setting of SABR.Methods and Materials: Three expert radiation oncologists contoured 10 GTV volumes on 3 MR imaging sequences and on the CT image data set. Three metrics were chosen to evaluate the interobserver variability: the conformity index, the DICE coefficient, and the maximum Hausdorff distance (HDmax). Statistical analysis of the results was performed using a 1-sided permutation test.Results: For all 3 metrics, the MR liver acquisition volume acquisition (MR LAVA) showed the lowest interobserver variability. Analysis showed a significant difference (P < .01) in the mean DICE, an overlap metric, for MR LAVA (0.82) and CT (0.74). The HDmax that highlights boundary errors also showed a significant difference (P = .04) with MR LAVA having a lower mean HDmax (7.2 mm) compared with CT (5.7 mm). The mean HDmax for both MR single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) (19.3 mm) and diffusion weighted image (9.5 mm) showed large interobserver variability with MR SSFSE having a mean HDmax of 19.3 mm. A volume comparison between MR LAVA and CT showed a significantly higher volume for small GTVs (<5 cm3) when using MR LAVA for contouring in comparison to CT.Conclusions: This study reported the lowest interobserver variability for the MR LAVA, thus indicating the benefit of using MR to complement CT when contouring GTV for colorectal liver metastases.(c) 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available