3.8 Article

1-year outcomes of patients admitted to critical care with treatment limitations: A dual-centre observational study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE INTENSIVE CARE SOCIETY
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 338-340

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/17511437221108900

Keywords

Treatment limitations; outcomes; critical care; intensive care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As the population ages, intensivists play a growing role in caring for frail patients. Careful decision-making that takes into account individual circumstances and weighs the benefits and risks of critical care is necessary in these situations. A dual-center observational study involving 3781 patients (2018-20) reported outcomes of patients with treatment limitations. Among those with treatment limitations, 55% survived to hospital discharge, with 69% of them eventually being discharged home and 39% still alive at 1 year. These findings provide objective data to support shared decision-making and future research can focus on identifying patients who are most likely to benefit from critical care.
Intensivists are increasingly involved in the care of frail patients as our population ages. Careful person-orientated, individualised decision-making, weighing benefits and harms of critical care are required in such situations. Few studies have reported outcomes of patients with treatment limitations. This dual-centre observational study reports outcomes of 3781 patients (2018-20). At least one treatment limitation was set at admission in 13% (n = 486). Of this group 55% survived to hospital discharge, of whom 69% were discharged home; 39% remained alive at 1 year. These findings provide objective data to support clinicians, patients and relatives in shared decision-making. Future multi-centre work could explore how best to identify those most likely to benefit from critical care

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available