Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Correction of scientific literature: Too little, too late!
Lonni Besançom et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2022)
Automated screening of COVID-19 preprints: can we help authors to improve transparency and reproducibility?
Tracey Weissgerber et al.
NATURE MEDICINE (2021)
How accurate are citations of frequently cited papers in biomedical literature?
Vedrana Pavlovic et al.
CLINICAL SCIENCE (2021)
Assessment of transparency indicators across the biomedical literature: How open is open?
Stylianos Serghiou et al.
PLOS BIOLOGY (2021)
Analysis of single comments left for bioRxiv preprints till September 2019
Mario Malicki et al.
BIOCHEMIA MEDICA (2021)
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2021)
Reporting ethical approval in health and social science articles: an audit of adherence to GDPR and national legislation
Kjell Asplund et al.
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS (2021)
Toward fulfilling the aspirational goal of science as self-correcting: A call for editorial courage and diligence for error correction
Colby J. Vorland et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION (2020)
The Rigor and Transparency Index Quality Metric for Assessing Biological and Medical Science Methods
Joe Menke et al.
ISCIENCE (2020)
Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis
Cassidy R. Sugimoto et al.
LANCET (2019)
Semi-automated fact-checking of nucleotide sequence reagents in biomedical research publications: The Seek & Blastn tool
Cyril Labbe et al.
PLOS ONE (2019)
Scoping review on interventions to improve adherence to reporting guidelines in health research
David Blanco et al.
BMJ OPEN (2019)
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints
Richard J. Abdill et al.
ELIFE (2019)
The ability of different peer review procedures to flag problematic publications
S. P. J. M. Horbach et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2019)
A randomised controlled trial of an Intervention to Improve Compliance with the ARRIVE guidelines (IICARus)
Kaitlyn Hair et al.
RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW (2019)
Automatic recognition of self-acknowledged limitations in clinical research literature
Halil Kilicoglu et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION (2018)
Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests of ANOVA'
Tracey L. Weissgerber et al.
ELIFE (2018)
The changing forms and expectations of peer review
S. P. J. M. (Serge) Horbach et al.
RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND PEER REVIEW (2018)
Top ten errors of statistical analysis in observational studies for cancer research
A. Carmona-Bayonas et al.
CLINICAL & TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY (2018)
Does the medical literature remain inadequately described despite having reporting guidelines for 21 years? - A systematic review of reviews: an update
Yanling Jin et al.
JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE (2018)
Duration and quality of the peer review process: the author's perspective
Janine Huisman et al.
SCIENTOMETRICS (2017)
Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study
Agnes Dechartres et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study
Agnes Dechartres et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2017)
The GRIM Test: A Simple Technique Detects Numerous Anomalies in the Reporting of Results in Psychology
Nicholas J. L. Brown et al.
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL AND PERSONALITY SCIENCE (2017)
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013)
Michele B. Nuijten et al.
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS (2016)
Why training and specialization is needed for peer review: a case study of peer review for randomized controlled trials
Jigisha Patel
BMC MEDICINE (2014)
Bias in peer review
Carole J. Lee et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (2013)
All That Glitters Isn't Gold: A Survey on Acknowledgment of Limitations in Biomedical Studies
Gerben ter Riet et al.
PLOS ONE (2013)
CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomised Trials
Kenneth F. Schulz et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2010)
CrossCheck: an effective tool for detecting plagiarism
Helen (Yuehong) Zhang
LEARNED PUBLISHING (2010)