3.8 Article

Independence and impartiality of contract administrators in the construction sector

Publisher

ICE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1680/jmapl.22.00023

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study reveals that there is independence and impartiality among contract administrators in the New Zealand construction sector, with most practitioners experiencing reasonable and fair actions from contract administrators in performing their duties.
Contract administrators play essential roles in the construction sector as they administrate the execution of construction contracts. A contract administrator acts as a representative of clients and an independent certifier to contractors. This dual role can bring conflicts within its duty; therefore, concerns have been raised regarding whether contract administrators can perform their duties fairly and impartially when serving clients and contractors. This study examines the independence and impartiality of contract administrators in the construction sector. This study reviews the current New Zealand standard construction contract forms to understand the role and position of contract administrators. A questionnaire survey was conducted in New Zealand to obtain views from 42 construction practitioners. Survey results suggest that the independence and impartiality of contract administrators may exist in the New Zealand construction sector, manifesting in the fact that most survey respondents experienced a reasonable and fair act from contract administrators when performing their duties. This study contributes to existing knowledge of contract administration by revealing the existence of independence and impartiality of contract administrators in the New Zealand construction sector. Also, this study contributes to industrial practices by putting forward the concerns and recommendations to improve the legal obligations of contract administrators in construction contract forms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available