4.0 Article

Automated Detection of Left Bundle Branch Block from ECG Signal Utilizing the Maximal Overlap Discrete Wavelet Transform with ANFIS

Journal

COMPUTERS
Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/computers11060093

Keywords

left bundle branch block; Maximal Overlapped Discrete Wavelet; QRS complex; R-heartbeat; Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to develop a method for detecting LBBB by analyzing QRS electrocardiogram complex segments and using an Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) classifier for identification. The proposed method showed good performance in real clinical situations, with robustness and high accuracy.
Left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a common disorder in the heart's electrical conduction system that leads to the ventricles' uncoordinated contraction. The complete LBBB is usually associated with underlying heart failure and other cardiac diseases. Therefore, early automated detection is vital. This work aimed to detect the LBBB through the QRS electrocardiogram (ECG) complex segments taken from the MIT-BIH arrhythmia database. The used data contain 2655 LBBB (abnormal) and 1470 normal signals (i.e., 4125 total signals). The proposed method was employed in the following steps: (i) QRS segmentation and filtration, (ii) application of the Maximal Overlapped Discrete Wavelet Transform (MODWT) on the ECG R wave, (iii) selection of the detailed coefficients of the MODWT (D2, D3, D4), kurtosis, and skewness as extracted features to be fed into the Adaptive Neuro-Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) classifier. The obtained results proved that the proposed method performed well based on the achieved sensitivity, specificity, and classification accuracies of 99.81%, 100%, and 99.88%, respectively (F-Score is equal to 0.9990). Our results showed that the proposed method was robust and effective and could be used in real clinical situations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available