3.8 Review

Exploring protein symmetry at the RCSB Protein Data Bank

Journal

EMERGING TOPICS IN LIFE SCIENCES
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/ETLS20210267

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [DBI-1832184]
  2. US Department of Energy [DE-SC0019749]
  3. National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health [R01GM133198]
  4. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R01GM133198]
  5. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases of the National Institutes of Health [R01GM133198]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The symmetry of biological molecules has intrigued structural biologists, with around 40% of structures exhibiting some type of symmetry. The RCSB Protein Data Bank offers tools for exploring the symmetry of biological macromolecules.
The symmetry of biological molecules has fascinated structural biologists ever since the structure of hemoglobin was determined. The Protein Data Bank (PDB) archive is the central global archive of three-dimensional (3D), atomic-level structures of biomolecules, providing open access to the results of structural biology research with no limitations on usage. Roughly 40% of the structures in the archive exhibit some type of symmetry, including formal global symmetry, local symmetry, or pseudosymmetry. The Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics (RCSB) Protein Data Bank (founding member of the Worldwide Protein Data Bank partnership that jointly manages, curates, and disse-minates the archive) provides a variety of tools to assist users interested in exploring the symmetry of biological macromolecules. These tools include multiple modalities for searching and browsing the archive, turnkey methods for biomolecular visualization, documentation, and outreach materials for exploring functional biomolecular symmetry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available