Journal
JOURNAL OF PROPERTY INVESTMENT & FINANCE
Volume 41, Issue 1, Pages 92-105Publisher
EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JPIF-03-2022-0022
Keywords
Real estate; Property developers; Feasibility; Practices; Hurdle rates; Australasia
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study examines the relationships between developer characteristics and the use of hurdle rate metrics. It finds that dominant property type, ownership, organizational structure, and size all influence the selection of hurdle rates.
Purpose The purpose of this study is to analyse the current relationships between developer characteristics in terms of dominant property type (residential, commercial, retail, industrial, tourism, other), ownership (publicly listed, publicly unlisted, private, government), organisational structure (speculative-trader, investor developers, development managers) and size (small, medium, large) in the frequency of use and required minimum value of hurdle rate metrics. Design/methodology/approach A questionnaire survey of 225 Australian and New Zealand trader developers, development managers, investors, valuers, fund managers and government/charities/other relating to the feasibility practices of different types of Australia/New Zealand property development companies. Findings (1) Residential dominant developers are more likely to use margin on development cost (MDC) required to have a higher minimum internal rate of return (IRR) percentage; (2) investor developers are more likely to use the payback period as a hurdle rate, and specific hurdle rates as a part of a go/no-go decision; (3) trader developers adopt a higher percentage of IRR and deviate further from accepted financial theory in hurdle rate selection; and (4) national property development organisations in multiple geographic regions use qualitative frameworks more as a decision-making process and use MDC less as a hurdle rate. Practical implications The study is limited to a sample of property practitioners working in Australia/New Zealand at the time of data collection in 2016 and, further empirical research is needed spatially and temporally to determine the extent of the findings. Further research is also needed with small- to medium-sized development organisations' on the extent to which they should use different metrics in project selection and for an improved understanding of the technical and attitudinal difficulties facing their current adoption. Originality/value First study to examine the feasibility practices of different types of Australia/New Zealand property developers.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available