4.6 Article

Subtropical fruits grown in Spain and elsewhere: A comparison of mineral profiles

Journal

JOURNAL OF FOOD COMPOSITION AND ANALYSIS
Volume 48, Issue -, Pages 34-40

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfca.2016.02.001

Keywords

Subtropical fruits; Food analysis; Food composition; Mineral composition; Potassium; Calcium; Sodium; Phosphorous

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [AGL2014-53895-R]
  2. European Fund of Regional Development (FEDER)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Large quantities of essential minerals are present in subtropical fruits, which constitute a valuable, if relatively unknown, source of dietary micronutrients, and consumption of these foods is tending to increase. Our aim in this study was to investigate the mineral composition (Ca, P, Na and K) of Spanish grown subtropical fruits in comparison with that of similar fruits sourced elsewhere. The contribution of these fruits to total daily mineral intake per capita in Spain and to mineral intake per regular fruit size was also estimated. The results obtained showed the mineral content of the Spanish-origin samples to be comparable to that of those from other countries, except for avocados, in which the concentrations of P and K were noticeably higher in the non-Spanish fruits (530 vs. 196 and 5260 vs. 3664 mg/kg, respectively). The contribution of subtropical fruits to daily mineral intake in adults was estimated to be 2-7% for Ca and P, approximately 10% for K and negligible for Na. In conclusion, subtropical fruits of Spanish origin present a balanced mineral composition and the consumption of these fruits is recommended as a means of increasing the intake of essential minerals (especially in a population such as that of Spain, where there is considerable room for improvement in dietary patterns). (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available