Journal
LEARNED PUBLISHING
Volume 35, Issue 4, Pages 674-677Publisher
WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/leap.1484
Keywords
Peer review; Publication; Writing
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The article emphasizes that reviewer comments are helpful in improving article quality, but many authors have negative attitudes towards reviewer comments, finding them unclear, inappropriate, and unpleasant. The article also highlights the characteristics that reviewers should possess when conducting reviews, such as being brief, quick, clear, specific, and only requesting feasible tasks within a short period of time.
Key points More often than authors would like, submitted manuscripts are returned to them for further revision. Most authors recognize that reviewer comments do help to improve articles, but many find reviewer comments unclear, inappropriate, unpleasant, and often frankly irritating. Reviewers should not review articles if they know they are incompetent or have strong opinions about the methodology or hypothesis. Reviewers should be brief, quick, clear, specific, and only ask what is feasible in a short period of time. Asking for full literature reviews, multiple additional references, and research background is often impossible given journal requirements for brevity.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available