4.5 Article

Numerical modeling of current loads on a net cage considering fluid-structure interaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES
Volume 62, Issue -, Pages 350-366

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.01.004

Keywords

Net cage; Numerical simulation; Current loads; Fluid-structure interaction; Finite volume method; Hybrid volume

Funding

  1. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of National Natural Science Foundation of China [5121004]
  2. National Hi-tech Research and Development Program of China (863 Program) [2009AA045004, 2012AA092301]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we propose and discuss a numerical method to model the current loads on a net cage. In our numerical model, the fluid-structure interaction is taken into consideration. The net cage is modeled on the mass-spring model; the flow field is modeled by the finite volume method (FVM). A novel hybrid volume approach is used to add the resistance force of the net cage into the flow field for coupling the fluid and net. The net resistance to the flow is calculated directly by the net's current load using Newton's Third Law. The resistance force is discretized in the hybrid volume and represented in the source term of the Navier-Stokes equation. By using the hybrid volume method, the mesh grid is separated from the net shape, and sparse grid (0.1 m) can be used to calculate the flow field for computational efficiency. Based on the detailed flow field, we can predict the net's current load more accurately. The final results are derived by the segregated iterative calculation of net shape and flow field. Current forces acting on both rigid and flexible net cages are simulated at water velocity from 0 to 1 m/s; the simulation results of proposed numerical method are compared with the existing experiments, good agreements are shown in both flow field and current force, the mean normalized absolute error of the current force between simulations and measurements is about 5%. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available