4.7 Article

Dense granular flow rheology in turbulent bedload transport

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 804, Issue -, Pages 490-512

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2016.520

Keywords

granular media; rheology; sediment transport

Funding

  1. Irstea (formerly Cemagref)
  2. labex OSUG@2020
  3. French Institut National des Sciences de l'Univers programs [EC2CO-BIOHEFECT, EC2CO-LEFE MODSED]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The local granular rheology is investigated numerically in turbulent bedload transport. Considering spherical particles, steady uniform configurations are simulated using a coupled fluid-discrete-element model. The stress tensor is computed as a function of the depth for a series of simulations varying the Shields number, the specific density and the particle diameter. The results are analysed in the framework of the mu(I) rheology and exhibit a collapse of both the shear to normal stress ratio and the solid volume fraction over a wide range of inertial numbers. Contrary to expectations, the effect of the interstitial fluid on the granular rheology is shown to be negligible, supporting recent work suggesting the absence of a clear transition between the free-fall and turbulent regimes. In addition, data collapse is observed up to unexpectedly high inertial numbers I similar to 2, challenging the existing conceptions and parametrisation of the mu(I) rheology. Focusing upon bedload transport modelling, the results are pragmatically analysed in the mu(I) framework in order to propose a granular rheology for bedload transport. The proposed rheology is tested using a 1D volume-averaged two-phase continuous model, and is shown to accurately reproduce the dense granular flow profiles and the sediment transport rate over a wide range of Shields numbers. The present contribution represents a step in the upscaling process from particle-scale simulations towards large-scale applications involving complex flow geometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available