4.7 Article

A dissipative random velocity field for fully developed fluid turbulence

Journal

JOURNAL OF FLUID MECHANICS
Volume 794, Issue -, Pages 369-408

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2016.166

Keywords

intermittency; isotropic turbulence; turbulence modelling

Funding

  1. ANR Liouville project of the French Agence Nationale de la Recherche [ANR-15-CE40-0013]
  2. CAPES [9497/13-7]
  3. PSMN (Pole Scientifique de Modelisation Numerique) computing centre of ENS de Lyon

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the statistical properties, based on numerical simulations and analytical calculations, of a recently proposed stochastic model for the velocity field (Chevillard et al., Europhys. Lett., vol. 89, 2010, 54002) of an incompressible, homogeneous, isotropic and fully developed turbulent flow. A key step in the construction of this model is the introduction of some aspects of the vorticity stretching mechanism that governs the dynamics of fluid particles along their trajectories. An additional further phenomenological step aimed at including the long range correlated nature of turbulence makes this model dependent on a single free parameter, gamma, that can be estimated from experimental measurements. We confirm the realism of the model regarding the geometry of the velocity gradient tensor, the power-law behaviour of the moments of velocity increments (i.e. the structure functions) including the intermittent corrections and the existence of energy transfer across scales. We quantify the dependence of these basic properties of turbulent flows on the free parameter gamma and derive analytically the spectrum of exponents of the structure functions in a simplified non-dissipative case. A perturbative expansion in power of gamma shows that energy transfer, at leading order, indeed take place, justifying the dissipative nature of this random field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available