4.4 Article

The Future of Fishing for Fun: The Economics and Sustainable Management of Recreational Fisheries

Journal

REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND POLICY
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 262-281

Publisher

UNIV CHICAGO PRESS
DOI: 10.1086/720987

Keywords

Q26; Q22; Q51

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The management of recreational fisheries has been overlooked by economists, despite their significant economic benefits and ecological impacts. This article examines the threats to efficient and sustainable management of recreational fisheries within the human-natural system, and discusses the potential role of economics in addressing these challenges. It also compares and contrasts commercial and recreational fisheries, highlighting the implications for management theory and practice. The article concludes by identifying crucial research gaps that need to be addressed for policy makers to accurately assess the costs and benefits of recreational fishery policies.
The management of recreational fisheries has received relatively little research attention from economists. Nevertheless, recreational fisheries generate substantial economic benefits and ecological impacts in many freshwater and marine systems, although they frequently face a range of management challenges. In this article we consider the endogenous feedbacks and exogenous stressors within the coupled human-natural system of recreational fisheries that threaten their efficient and sustainable management, and we review the potential role of economics in addressing these challenges. We discuss key similarities and differences between commercial and recreational fisheries and the implications of the differences for the theory and practice of managing recreational fisheries. Finally, we identify important research gaps that must be addressed to enable policy makers to more accurately weigh the costs and benefits of changes to recreational fishery policies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available