4.5 Article

Exploring the dynamic spillover of cryptocurrency environmental attention across the commodities, green bonds, and environment-related stocks

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.najef.2022.101700

Keywords

Cryptocurrency environmental attention (ICEA) index; Spillovers; Commodity markets; Green bond markets; Environment-related stocks

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the dynamic spillover impact of cryptocurrency environmental attention on commodities, green bonds, and environment-related stocks. The findings suggest that although there is a sharp increase in cryptocurrency environmental attention, most assets are not strongly linked to it.
We analyze the dynamic spillover impact of cryptocurrency environmental attention (ICEA) on three asset classes: commodities, green bonds (GBs), and environment-related stocks. Our wavelet-based analysis suggests that ICEA is sharply escalated after the first quarter of 2021. During this period of intense attention, only the soybean commodity and Solactive GB tend to move positively and negatively with ICEA, respectively. Accordingly, the clean energy, sustainability, and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) stock indices are positively associated with ICEA during 2018-2019 at the medium frequency bands. In most periods and frequency domains, most commodities, GBs, and environment-related stocks are not strongly linked to ICEA. Moreover, Diebold and Yilmaz's (2014) spillover estimations signify no strong spillover effect of ICEA on the asset classes considered in this study. These findings are further corroborated by the wavelet-based Granger causality analysis. Moreover, our quantile regression (QR) estimations suggest that most assets are adversely influenced by ICEA, depending on the market conditions. Our research conveys some novel and vital policy ramifications to both investors and policymakers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available