4.4 Article

Distribution and ecology of lampreys Lethenteron spp. in interior Alaskan rivers

Journal

JOURNAL OF FISH BIOLOGY
Volume 90, Issue 4, Pages 1196-1213

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.13216

Keywords

Chatanika; Chena; habitat; phenetics; size structure; trophic ecology

Funding

  1. UAF School of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences
  2. ADFG [T-10-3 P-07, T-10-4 P-07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study describes phenetic characteristics and examines the life history of anadromous Arctic lamprey Lethenteron camtschaticum and freshwater-resident Alaskan brook lamprey Lethenteron alaskense in two tributaries of the middle Yukon River, Alaska. Larval lampreys could not be identified to species using pigmentation density patterns or trunk myomere counts, but adults could be identified to species based on colouration, body size and oral-disc dentition. Although larvae were patchily distributed in both rivers, there was a greater proportion of sample locations where Lethenteron spp. were absent in upper reaches than in middle and lower reaches. Relative abundance, density and median and maximum total length (L-T) of larvae were highly variable among sampling locations. Current velocity, substratum type and coarse woody debris were most strongly correlated with larval Lethenteron spp. density; velocity and substratum size was negatively correlated, whereas woody debris was positively correlated. Water depth, dissolved oxygen levels and specific conductance did not influence habitat selection. Length-frequency distributions, diet composition (organic detritus >= 98%), assimilation efficiency (>70%) and gut fullness (<0.2 mg diet ash-free dry mass) were similar for larvae, regardless of river or sampling location. These results increase understanding of Lethenteron spp. biology and ecology in interior Alaska drainages and add to the existing literature on Lethenteron spp. life history.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available