4.3 Article

Ups and downs in finance, ups without downs in inequality

Journal

SOCIO-ECONOMIC REVIEW
Volume 21, Issue 3, Pages 1601-1627

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwac036

Keywords

inequality; finance; financial crisis; regulation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The upswing and downswing in finance have asymmetric effects on inequality, with downswings not leading to a symmetric decline in inequality.
The upswing in finance in recent decades has led to rising inequality, but do downswings in finance lead to a symmetric decline in inequality? We analyze the asymmetry of the effect of ups and downs in finance, and the effect of increased capital requirements and the bonus cap on national earnings inequality. We use administrative employer-employee-linked data from 1990 to 2019 for 12 countries and data from bank reports, from 2009 to 2017 in 13 European countries. We find a strong asymmetry in the effect of upswings and downswings in finance on earnings inequality, a weak, if any, mitigating effect of capital requirements on finance's contribution to inequality, and a restructuring but no absolute effect of the bonus cap on financiers' earnings. We suggest that while rising financiers' wages increase inequality in upswings, they are resilient in downswings and thus downswings do not contribute to a symmetric decline in inequality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available