4.1 Article

Individual differences in children's anthropomorphic tendencies to their special objects

Journal

COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 63, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2022.101224

Keywords

Anthropomorphism; Attachment object; Personified object; Parent-child discourse

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS, Japan) KAKENHI [JP20J14429]
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT, Japan) Promotion of Distinctive Joint Research Center Program [JPMXP0619217850]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates individual differences in children's anthropomorphic tendencies toward their special objects and finds that these differences are correlated with parents' anthropomorphic tendencies, rather than being influenced by the motivation for social connection and the type of object.
This study describes individual differences in children's anthropomorphic tendencies toward their special objects. It explores factors related to the individual differences, focusing on the effect of motivation for social connection, type of special object (personified objects or not), and parents' anthropomorphic tendencies. Fifty-five children, aged 4-6 years, participated. To manipulate children's motivation for social connection, we experimentally primed children for loneliness. Parents' anthropomorphic tendencies were measured by a questionnaire and direct observation. We found individual differences in children's anthropomorphic tendencies toward their special objects and a novel stuffed animal. Children's anthropomorphic tendency was not influenced by the motivation for social connection. Children's anthropomorphic tendencies did not depend on the type of object. Instead, parents' anthropomorphic tendencies were significantly correlated with those of their children. Our results suggest that individual differences in children's anthropomorphic tendencies might be learned through parent-child discourse.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available