4.5 Review

The stakeholder's roles in risk management related to food supply chain recalls: a systematic literature review

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
Volume 34, Issue 1, Pages 106-129

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-05-2021-0261

Keywords

Food recall; Food supply chain; Risk management; Stakeholder theory

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes the roles of different stakeholders in managing risks in food recall events. A systematic literature review was conducted, identifying nine stakeholders and their risk management actions in food supply chain recalls.
Purpose Food supply chains (FSCs) are becoming increasingly complex and vulnerable to recall risks due to quality failures. Measures for supply chain risk management can minimize these recall risks. However, this responsibility must be shared by all stakeholders in the chain. This study aims to analyze the roles of different stakeholders in managing risks in the events of food recalls. Design/methodology/approach A systematic literature review was carried out, and 110 articles were explored to identify risk management actions and to link them to the role of stakeholders involved in FSC recall. Findings The study found that nine stakeholders were responsible for 25 hazard management actions related to food safety and traceability systems, regulatory and preventive measures, and control and response mechanisms for food recalls in the FSC. Originality/value This article contributes to the literature by proposing an explanatory map associating risk management actions to different stakeholders in food recall. The actions were grouped according to whether they were prevention actions to avoid a food recall or contention actions to limit the negative economic effects and maintain the health of the population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available