4.4 Article

Teacher-student relationship and student engagement: the moderating role of educational hope

Journal

EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 42, Issue 9, Pages 1180-1197

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01443410.2022.2108766

Keywords

Student engagement; teacher-student relationship; educational hope; Confucian Heritage Culture; instrumental help; emotional support

Funding

  1. Education Research Funding Programme, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore [OER 8/13CWH]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examines the role of educational hope in moderating the relationships between teacher-student relationships and student engagement, demonstrating its significance in students' performance and communication with teachers.
This Singapore study involved a sample of 3776 secondary school students to examine the role of educational hope in moderating the relationships between teacher-student relationship dimensions (instrumental help, emotional support, relationship satisfaction, relationship conflict) and student engagement dimensions (perceived importance of schooling, school belonging, and effort expenditure). Besides its main associations with the student engagement dimensions, educational hope was found to be a significant moderator in the relationships (a) between perceived teacher instrumental help and perceived importance of schooling, and (b) between perceived teacher emotional support and effort expenditure, such that students high on perceived instrumental help or teacher emotional support and educational hope were also those high on the perceived importance of schooling or effort expenditure. This study demonstrates that the constructs, though theorised in Western contexts, have empirical utility and relevance for understanding the engagement of students in the Singapore context. Implications arising from this study are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available