4.3 Article

Engaging the public or asking your friends? Analysing science-related crowdfunding using behavioural and survey data

Journal

PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE
Volume 31, Issue 8, Pages 993-1011

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09636625221113134

Keywords

crowdfunding; digital platforms; funding; public engagement; science communication

Funding

  1. Gebert Ruef Stiftung [GRS-040/15, GRS-015/18]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Science-related crowdfunding enables public engagement with science, but currently only a small segment of the public, who have above-average education and income, participate in science crowdfunding. These backers mainly have an existing interest in science, personal ties to project initiators or the scientific community. The size of donations is mainly influenced by personal appeals in campaigns or connections to initiators, rather than the scientific merit of projects.
Science-related crowdfunding enables public engagement with science. However, we know little about citizens engaging with science this way: Who are the people engaging with and donating to science through crowdfunding - and how do they decide how much to give? This study analyses behavioural and survey data from the Swiss crowdfunding platform wemakeit (N = 576). Results illustrate that a small, non-representative segment of the public engages with science through crowdfunding. Compared to the general public in Switzerland, these backers have an above-average education and income. Science-related crowdfunding mainly reaches citizens with an existing interest in science, personal ties to project initiators or the scientific community. The size of backers' donations correlates with perceived personal appeals in campaigns or connections to initiators rather than projects' scientific merit. While science-related crowdfunding thus opens up new avenues for public outreach by the scientific community, its potential for broader public engagement with science seems limited.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available