4.4 Article

Intellectual Structure of the Hospitality Literature Via Topic Modeling Analysis

Journal

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/10963480221118814

Keywords

intellectual; knowledge; text-net analysis; theory; hospitality

Funding

  1. Hainan Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Project [HNSK(YB)22-25]
  2. Chris Ryan's Academician Workstation in Hainan Province

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the hidden intellectual structure and research trends in hospitality research. The findings show that empirical testing of relationships is prioritized over theory building in this field. Additionally, a stakeholder research approach, including perspectives from management, employees, and customers, was identified. These insights contribute to a better understanding of the field and offer valuable implications for practitioners.
The purpose of this research was to provide a comprehensive analysis of the hidden intellectual structure of hospitality research. This study combined Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) and text-net analysis (TNA) as the topic modeling approach for 7,931 articles with approximately 290,000 references in seven top-tier hospitality journals from 1960 to 2019. A total of 10 specific research topics were identified, with their probability timelines, in hospitality research. The results showed that hospitality research is focused on the empirical testing of relationships rather than theory building. A stakeholder research approach was identified, which includes the perspectives of management, employees, and customers. These findings contribute by revealing the hidden pattern of intellectual structures and research trends in hospitality research and overcoming the weaknesses of traditional co-citation analysis. Also, the study provides evidence of a shift from narrow to diverse research topics, thereby offering useful implications for hospitality practitioners.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available