4.2 Article

Closure scheme for stably stratified turbulence without critical Richardson number

Journal

SN APPLIED SCIENCES
Volume 4, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER INT PUBL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-022-05088-8

Keywords

Atmospheric boundary layer; Second-order closure model; Turbulence parameterizations; strong stratification; Critical Richardson number

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [GACR GA19-04243S]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a new modification to the second order turbulence closure that removes the limitation posed by the critical gradient Richardson number in Mellor-Yamada style models. The newly modified model's mean wind speed and potential temperature profiles are derived in terms of similarity and structure functions, depending on the gradient Richardson number. The derivation is based on a second order boundary layer approximation under neutral to very stable stratification conditions. The paper also investigates the variances and covariances of the turbulent fluctuations with respect to the gradient Richardson number, and compares the predictions of the new model with well known existing models.
This paper presents a new modification of the second order turbulence closure that removes the critical gradient Richardson number limitation typically found in Mellor-Yamada style models. The mean wind speed and potential temperature profiles are derived for the newly modified model in terms of similarity and structure functions depending on the gradient Richardson number. The derivation is based on a second order boundary layer approximation in neutral to very stable stratification conditions. Some recent closure assumptions for pressure-temperature and heat flux are considered. Variances and covariances of the turbulent fluctuations are also investigated with respect to the gradient Richardson number. The new model predictions are confronted with some well known models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available